PDA

View Full Version : Social Party Locking vs. Performance Locking(By OG Skeeter Rabbit)


lanier2
08-31-2008, 09:55 PM
We all remember getting up on Saturday morning to watch COUPLES facing each other or dancing down the soul train line to the beats of Marvin Gaye or James Brown, that's right couples no pre plan ! just dancing, some gyrations, some fancy footwork and yes SOME pointing and Locking, Now we can all remember about a year later. turning on the television and watching a group of dancers on a stage facing and audience and performing a pre planed routine which consisted of some individual solos and some pre planned unison steps.. Umm there is a difference between dancing and performing. And that difference exist today also. That is not to say that one is better than the other. Not all great dancers become great commercial performers as classical dancers. And not all dancing performers are great dancers. A great performance can be exciting, unique, intriguing or comedic to and audience. But a great dancer does not necessarily need an audience it is inner and expresses itself outward. He or she can be intuitive, spontaneous , have a sense of rhythm or passion with the ability to communicate that passion through movement, they have the ability to be inspired or to inspire, to feel the lead or to follow, To create or respond. That is where many of today's lockers are lost they want to be great locking performers or entertainers and not conscious of becoming great Locking DANCERS

Well lets not be confused as to what came first. there is a reason Don Campbell teaches the freedom of creation and the improvisational side of Locking. And that is because that is where it came from, But that part of the dance came from the creative side of the social party dance scene, NOT THE PERFORMANCE, and that is where Don, first implemented it at , not on a stage.

you see the social party was on the dance floor of the clubs and dances. while on the dance floor (not the stage) we were free to create. We would do the social party dances as couples and in between the established moves and steps, we would create our own styles and steps. This included what became Locking moves. Don was the very first streetdancer to interject various social gestures (these came from the social messages in the music). He did this along his unique freezing style of the funky chicken. These things were added to the other social dances and moves and WHAM ! You have the beginnings of Locking. While couple dancing you either improvised ,responded or followed and that was what was done, not only by the partner but often by others or sometimes the entire room joined in. Many of steps that people loved to follow on are the steps that eventually became unison steps. And the moves and gestures that were responded to was the body communication between two or more people. This is when one dancer does something on the DANCE FLOOR and his partner or another dancer answers or responds to it. with the same or another move

This Social or Party dancing is the ROOT of what eventually became a performance. This is what came first as locking then continued to evolve .

During these social parties couples or even the entire room communicated through body movements. Guys and girls flirted, Dancers acknowledged each other and the expression of the LYRICS were mimicked. These were all for the most part spontaneous actions. And this is the part Don Campbell emphasizes with such great passion. And how can you blame him this was a wonderful part of the dances history. But it is not the ONLY part of the dances history.

But now came the development into a PERFORMACE or ACT of Locking. And that also came from the elements of the party dancing. At first it was still done social and spontaneous and not for money. The combination of the improvisational social steps and locking moves had naturally merged with unison steps These steps developed while following the moves of others on the dance floor. And contrary to what many believe were not PLANNED steps for a performance. The first small performances also develop spontaneously as small duos and trios of locking dancers (such as the GoGo brothers) would gather on the party dance floors. Others would stop and encourage them to respond or follow each other. These became the first impromptu mini shows .Many of the original pioneers were so used to dancing around each other and together in the PARTY scene that they could improvise and put together a small routine on the spot.

These mini performances, began to spread to basketball courts, street corners, and parks .But it was still a spontaneous STREET dance that was moving toward a performance. and now dancers could preplan parts of their routines for talent and other local shows. But the spontaneity was not totally restricted

This attracted the professional commercial market dance moved to a paid professional ACT Professional Promoters could now visualize the marketability of a structured LOCKING performance.. Now the essence of of its creative origin was lost. Each and every count or beat had to be accounted for, Dancers had to be exactly on camera que. routines and every beat in the music was preplanned , Even solos had to be choreographed, and exact positions blocked. This was not the freedom of creativity us street dancers or the dance itself had drawn its power or purpose from, however it is what we as street dancers are willing to accept. Some of us for the fame, some for the money. But I would like to think that some for the opportunity to allow this great art form to be documented and passed down So now The ORIGINAL ARTFORM of Locking (or OG LOCKING) as a performance and a historical dance was NOW complete. And it is what you see on stage , but lets not forget it was inspired by many elements and people. Not just the performance. It is what is the foundation and guideline for the structured classical dance of locking

But lets not forget the creativity involved with the social dance of Locking is NEVER COMPLETE it is just as it was when Don instituted it and many implemented it many years ago. It evolved on the social party scene many years ago. And it SHOULD continue to grow. And HOPEFULLY other creative moves and steps will find their way into this wonderful art form, and give today's evolution of Locking a much needed universal purpose again

Visit These Links:
http://www.myspace.com/lockerlegends
http://lierreproductions.com/CAMPBELLOCKPAGE.html
http://oldschoolsports.itcstore.com/

Liquid Toez
09-01-2008, 09:47 AM
Good read.

Where would you place "locking battles"? maybe somewhere between social dance locking and performance locking?

Peace \ /

Boogiewalker
09-01-2008, 03:05 PM
Word. I think another thing that prevents people from really involving the "social dance" aspect of locking is that the contests are judged basically by many folks that EXPECT that if you are gonna be locking, you'd better look pretty darn near close to the original Campbellock Dancers (the group) in their stage performance appearance and dancing.

Locking battles didn't really exist back in the day according to most of the OGs I've talked to. The whole "battle" phenomenon is much more of an East Coast/Bboy thing that has been projected onto locking since it resurfaced into public view as a street dance at competitions and jams in the last 10 years or so...

Locking wasn't about "battling"... they'd have dance contests to see who could dance better, but they never faced each other and faced off, according to people like OG Skeet or Don. I think that's also been the impetus behind recent events (e.g. Homeland) not having their locking contest judged in a "battle" format, but rather, in a "showcase" format, which makes it a little more focussed on the dancer and the music rather than on "beating" an opponent...

I personally prefer this style of competition to battling. Showcasing is to dance as a form of entertainment and allows you to draw on that kind of energy...

Anyway, good post. Kaistar, can we get this moved or copied to the locking forum? It'd be cool to have it there too...

peas,

BW

lanier2
09-01-2008, 04:18 PM
Thanks for the responses guys, Skeeter Rabbit would like all of you guys to give your input one this subject. He is really interested in you guys thoughts on this.

ordernchaos
09-01-2008, 08:55 PM
I think that some people on WCP have express thoughts as to why locking has not evolved or progressed. I remember a thread about this less than a year ago.

When it came to my attention about some of Don's thoughts concerning the creative side of locking, from his My Space page. I got real interested. In fact I believe locking has not progressed past a certain point because the creative side of locking has not been emphasized enough. Everyone of the original lockers had a unique style. In locking battles you do not see a real distinction between contestants like you saw in the originals.

However.

Its great that people can learn all the moves of the past, and the opportunity to learn classical locking forms should never go away. In this way we can preserve the dance.

So we have a dilemma. How do we encourage creativity and originality without losing the art form as we see it today.

Answer?

Have more open events. So people can pop, boog, poplock, lock, tic, puppet, animate, or mix it all up. These open events would not be for everyone. It would only be for those who enjoy learning street dance by experimentation, perhaps even creating there own styles. An open event would encourage this creative process to start again (like it was in the 70's).

lanier2
09-02-2008, 03:10 PM
Thats real man, I still think that Lockin aint goin nowhere, whether it evolves or not. Hell, I think I may love locking more than poppin. I guess its the energy and character that comes out of that dancestyle that just off the chain. I love watching the original locker footage tho. That group was full of characters. I think Fred's character stood out more, him being heavy set and all. I had never seen a big dude move the way he did.


I think that some people on WCP have express thoughts as to why locking has not evolved or progressed. I remember a thread about this less than a year ago.

When it came to my attention about some of Don's thoughts concerning the creative side of locking, from his My Space page. I got real interested. In fact I believe locking has not progressed past a certain point because the creative side of locking has not been emphasized enough. Everyone of the original lockers had a unique style. In locking battles you do not see a real distinction between contestants like you saw in the originals.

However.

Its great that people can learn all the moves of the past, and the opportunity to learn classical locking forms should never go away. In this way we can preserve the dance.

So we have a dilemma. How do we encourage creativity and originality without losing the art form as we see it today.

Answer?

Have more open events. So people can pop, boog, poplock, lock, tic, puppet, animate, or mix it all up. These open events would not be for everyone. It would only be for those who enjoy learning street dance by experimentation, perhaps even creating there own styles. An open event would encourage this creative process to start again (like it was in the 70's).

Kaistar
09-03-2008, 01:33 AM
Copied From The Main Popping/locking Room.

buddha stretch
09-03-2008, 03:18 AM
I think that some people on WCP have express thoughts as to why locking has not evolved or progressed. I remember a thread about this less than a year ago.

When it came to my attention about some of Don's thoughts concerning the creative side of locking, from his My Space page. I got real interested. In fact I believe locking has not progressed past a certain point because the creative side of locking has not been emphasized enough. Everyone of the original lockers had a unique style. In locking battles you do not see a real distinction between contestants like you saw in the originals.

However.

Its great that people can learn all the moves of the past, and the opportunity to learn classical locking forms should never go away. In this way we can preserve the dance.

So we have a dilemma. How do we encourage creativity and originality without losing the art form as we see it today.

Answer?

Have more open events. So people can pop, boog, poplock, lock, tic, puppet, animate, or mix it all up. These open events would not be for everyone. It would only be for those who enjoy learning street dance by experimentation, perhaps even creating there own styles. An open event would encourage this creative process to start again (like it was in the 70's).
THAT THREAD WAS CONTINUED HERE,IF YOU FEEL LIKE READING THRU IT....IT'S STICKIED @ THE TOP...PEACE

JAQQHC3
09-18-2008, 08:02 PM
I don't feel qualified to talk on this subject, but, here goes:
I'm so glad this topic has been brought up, both on lockerlegends, and here. Like many street dancers, I lean towards party dancing and am hesitant to perform in a show. Why? I've never taken a dance class. I've never counted steps or memorized routines. The mechanics of performing are foreign to me. I love to dance, I love to feel the rhythm and move to the music. These descriptions paint me as a terrible performer, yet a fluent dancer. For me, I've started dancing, and will then progress or, learn to perform. Many I've met are on the other side of the coin. They are great performers and they make awesome scripts that translate well to other performers, but they have yet to become "smooth" as they dance without outlines.
I feel much better knowing that the dancing is critical to lockin' rather than the performing. I find performing, in it's pursuit for precision, can be overwhelming and impersonal, when planned beat for beat. I love to see a locker get down to a song and be playful with the surroundings, just having a ball and boosting everyone in the room. It's such a positive experience, and that is what sparked me into lockin' in the first place, it's fun with no frills to it. As I've become better at lockin' I try to attend as many venues as I can where I can boogie down to inspire others who want to lock as well. Is that how locking began? Spreading from party to party by Don and others? Party lockin' to me, was much more approachable than performance lockin'.

flexystudio
10-25-2008, 03:32 PM
Very nice dialogue chaps.
i do think a clear distinction should be mad when we are judging such battles as Uk Bboy championships as this is a Bboy even and it is a battle.
you can social dance all you want but it is a Locking Battle!
time and a place yafeelme?

Flexito

http://www.blogtv.com/Shows/247791/ZmXwbuNtae3wYeTDY_&pos=ancr
--

www.flexystudio.com (http://www.flexystudio.com)